Saturday, 26 September 2015

SNP, Lib Dems and Labour out

Politics is not like football, though too many treat it as if it is. It doesn’t fundamentally matter if Aberdeen win, or more likely, don’t win the league. Likewise it doesn’t matter if the Lib Dems win one seat or fifty-seven. What matters is not the existence of a political party, but the things that are achieved by political action. If the political goals of liberalism could best be achieved by the Lib Dems ceasing to exist, there would be no reason in and of itself to preserve the Lib Dems. The one party that understands this is the SNP. If the price of achieving independence was that the SNP ceased to exist, every single SNP supporter would grasp this opportunity with both hands.

There are two types of people involved in politics. There are party supporters and there are the rest of us. The former strongly identify with the party, get involved at times of elections, wear rosettes and think the main political goal is that their party wins or at least wins more seats. This is to treat politics as if it were football.  

A political party winning seats or not winning seats doesn’t matter at all to me. Party politics is not an end in itself, but a means to bring about long term goals. I have only one long term goal. That the UK should be as prosperous, free, united and fair as possible. Of course it’s only by winning seats that a party can have any chance of bringing about a goal. But I have, over the years, been willing to lend my vote to various parties insofar as I thought at that time they would best help my long term goal. I vote in this way also, because I never want to see one party in power for too long. This inevitably leads to poor government. Therefore above all I want the electorate to be able to kick out any government that has been in power too long.

I have had a policy of being reasonably politically neutral while writing, but that has changed this week. My long term political goal can at present only be fulfilled by the Conservative party in Scotland. The reaction of the Labour Party and the Lib Dems after the general election has been most illuminating. They think that what matter is the number of seats they win. This does not matter. Because they think what matters is increasing their seats they are willing to do what is necessary in order to do so. This shows in fact that it would be better if they did not exist. It is after all a short step from one to zero.

Some months ago I was involved in a tactical voting campaign. I urged people to vote for whichever of the Lib Dems, Labour or Conservatives had the best chance of winning a particular seat. I did not organise or start this campaign, but was asked to help and did so, because at the time I did not think it mattered which of these parties won a particular seat. They all could play a part in my long term political goal.  I campaigned in this way because what matters to me most is the preservation of the UK. The UK is my country. I fight for it in the same way that an American would fight for the USA.

The tactical voting campaign failed to influence the result in Scotland. Perhaps even it made a bad situation worse. In a small way it may have helped influence events in the rest of the UK. The SNP are not in government in the UK. That was my only goal. It’s largely a matter of indifference to me now whether the SNP have six seats or fifty six. They are just as impotent.

But this is beside the point. The basis for my willingness to campaign for tactical voting was that there were people I agreed with and respected in each of the mainstream UK parties. The difference frankly between a Labour moderate, a Conservative moderate and many people in the Lib Dems is frankly trivial and amounts to the colour of their rosette.

So long as each major party supported the UK wholeheartedly then I could support them. In the past week however both Scottish Labour and the Scottish Lib Dems have said that they will allow MPs to support independence. Sorry you just lost my vote. How could I vote for a candidate who might support independence? How could I vote for a party that might work with the SNP? The SNP desperately need help from other parties. It makes their cause more mainstream and more legitimate. It’s a very small step from allowing MPs to support independence to actually supporting it yourself. Instead of fighting for the UK we have just another group of people who have meekly surrendered. Does anyone believe either Labour or the Lib Dems would oppose the SNP on a second referendum? Of course they wouldn’t, that might upset the people they are trying to attract back to their party. It’s just one more instance of putting party before country. It is this that I am fighting against. It is this that I have been fighting against all my life.

I always suspected during the last General Election campaign, that Labour and the Lib Dems would have made a deal with the SNP if it brought them to power. The idea that they would allow a Conservative minority government to rule unopposed was preposterous. The problem is that everyone in the rest of the UK knows this too. They will vote for anyone to avoid the fate of the SNP ruling England, so expect the decline of Labour and the Lib Dems to continue next time too.

Sorry but I take the same line. I'm going to vote for anyone but you also. Being Pro UK is the only policy to me that matters. It’s not something that I can allow a free vote on. If you think it’s like being pro or anti tuition fees, then I will see you as being rather lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, about an issue that it is fundamental to me and so of course I’ll spew you out, you and your whole party.

We have at the moment three opposition parties in Scotland each with one seat. It would be better by far that those who are soft on independence merge with the SNP. If you are on the left and support independence what reason do you have for not joining the SNP? Is it because you prefer Red and Orange to Yellow? This isn’t honest. This is to be a fellow traveller.

It is no more intrinsically unfair that five million or so people in the South East of England vote Conservative and get a Labour government than that five million people in Scotland vote Labour and get a Conservative Government. Each of us has one vote and is equally a citizen of the UK. That is how everyone more or less used to think in Scotland. But during the 1980s the Left in Scotland couldn’t quite bear that they were not in power and so they created the idea that unless they won the result was unfair. It is this that at root is the cause of Scottish nationalism. Once you go down that route then the logical endpoint is to vote for the SNP, because they have the only solution to the problem once you accept that it is a problem. The answer of course from the Pro UK perspective is that it is not a problem, no more here than in the United States. Parts of any democracy vote differently to the whole. This is not a fault. It’s a feature.
What is becoming ever clearer is that the Left in Scotland thinks achieving power is more important than preserving the UK. Hundreds of thousands of Labour supporters clearly are not that bothered if their goals are achieved within the UK or without. Breaking up the UK would be a small price to pay if only we could have higher benefits and an end to austerity. The trouble is that it’s clear now that Labour and the Lib Dems more or less agree with them. If they attracted back all their lost voters, how long would it be before either party came out in favour of independence? They would after all have to reflect the wishes of their members.

The whole problem in Scotland is that the Left is grotesquely overrepresented. 88% of seats in the Scottish parliament are held by left wing parties. There is thus no opposition. The parties on the Left agree on virtually everything. There was never a fundamental difference between them apart from on the issue of independence. Now they don’t even particularly disagree on this.

But it would be far better for those of us who support the UK to be the opposition to the SNP. The task is to make the Scottish parliament better reflect the attitudes of Scotland. We are, in fact, not much more left wing than any other part of the UK. But somehow, mainly because of the 1980s and hatred of Margaret Thatcher and the word 'Tory', we have got ourselves into the situation where we are effectively a one party state. Not because everyone votes for the SNP, but because everyone votes for the Left.

The reason the Left is soft on the issue of independence is that they see the UK as something that should exist at best for pragmatic reasons. It is for this reason that the campaign was called Better Together. Nonsense. The UK is our country and should be supported not because we get a grant from London or we get certain rights that we wouldn’t otherwise have. No other country would make this argument for why it ought to remain together. Does a Dane in Jutland think he's better together with a Dane from Funen. He wouldn't even understand the question. He's together because he's a Dane. Likewise we're united because we are British. That's it. No more arguments are necessary.

For the moment the Left in Scotland is part of the problem and not part of the solution. What Scotland needs is a centre right opposition to counter not only the SNP’s views on independence, but their whole ideology that every solution to every problem requires government intervention and public spending. Let those who agree with this solution merge into a single opposition. At least then we would know what we are fighting against.  

If we could have a balanced parliament in Scotland where something close to 50% of Scots voted for the centre right while 50% voted for the Left, then we would have taken the biggest step possible to securing the future of the UK.  It is for this reason above all that those UK supporters who care most about the future of our country should no longer vote Labour or Lib Dem. Voting for them will not help reduce 88% to 50%, rather it just adds to the tendency of moving us towards 100%.

Scotland at the moment is struggling economically. There is a reason for this. Part of the reason is that our prosperity depended on the price and the existence of a commodity, rather than the success of our businesses. It’s not accidental that the South East of England is more wealthy than Scotland. It’s not because they have secret oil fields. Rather it’s because they support business, free markets and enterprise. The reason Scotland is poorer is that on the whole we don’t. We prefer to get our money from Nanny Nicola and she prefers to get it from Nanny Dave. If you look on wealth creation as something a little slimy, don’t be surprised that you remain poor. Relying on the state to give you money is a recipe for being too wee, too poor and too stupid. This applies not only to Scotland it applies to every single country in the world.

So I’m no longer going to campaign for #SNPout rather I’m going to campaign for SNP, Labour and Lib Dem out. If you allow independence supporters into your party you’re all the same to me. If there is room for them, there's no room for me and I hope anyone else who voted No. 

I urge all No voters to vote for a party that actually does support the UK, that is actually willing to kick out anyone who supports independence. The Conservative party is straddling the centre ground. If you think that the UK should live within its means. If you think we should try to make a profit as a country rather than a loss. If you think the economy is doing reasonably well. But above all if your main long term goal is to keep the UK intact, then vote Conservative. It's the only party left in Scotland that shares your goals.

A year ago we won a great victory, but the response has been pathetic. Can you imagine the SNP allowing MPs to vote against independence? We are where we are in Scotland because the Left began to side with nationalism in the 1980s and have been lukewarm about the UK ever since. It would be better that they had never been born. Time to spit them out.



29 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent piece. Vote Conservative.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Delighted by your reasoning with which I concur.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know know where I first met you; St Andrews.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BTW Hows your Danish and Russian getting along, you World Traveller you?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Because of Westminsters support of business and the market the US Federal Reserve had to bail out the UK Banks to the tune of £1400 bilion UK couldn't do it.That is twice annual GDP of the UK. Tories have increase National debt from £700 Billion to over £1500 Billion in five years, great track record. What we don't have in Scotland is democracy, Westminster does not understand or represent Scotish people, just tries to put them in their place and diminish them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. British banks did not receive a single groat from the American taxpayer. See here:

      https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/list.

      I would also urge you to read these:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_United_Kingdom_bank_rescue_package

      http://www.theguardian.com/politics/reality-check-with-polly-curtis/2011/sep/12/reality-check-banking-bailout

      The final bank bailout cost was £955bn. British GDP in 2008 was £1.462tn. So even your GDP claims are nonsense.

      But you are right on one point: Westminster does not understand the Scottish people. Because almost all of the representatives we have sent there are living in a fantasy world.

      Delete
    2. "What we don't have in Scotland is democracy"

      Oh yes there is.

      Delete
    3. Almost painful to read, you are totally prepared to deny Scotland as a country to have self determination. And think it is fine we are told what to do for longer yet. I will never deny England to do what they think is best for them ! but do expect the same from them. And will for sure keep fighting for it .

      Delete
  7. "If the price of achieving independence was that the SNP ceased to exist, every single SNP supporter would grasp this opportunity with both hands."

    I have to say that that is a nonsense - a particularly hard one to prove at that.

    As for this...

    "I have only one long term goal. That the UK should be as prosperous, free, united and fair as possible."

    Surely the last five years has indicated that, if nothing else, you won't get any of that by voting for the Conservatives?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wonderful article, Effie, and I'm right there with you in this line of thinking. Indeed, the (largely Labour) BT campaign frustrated the hell out of me because it treated the UK as a commodity, as opposed to, you know, a country with an incredible history and one which is worth fighting for. So, looking on the bright side, if Labour and the LDs are out of the picture next time, we might, just might, get a more passionate campaign extolling the virtues of our country, and not just appealing to people's bank balances.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've repeatedly explained why Brit Nat is offensive. It gets an automatic block on Twitter. It get's a deletion here. I don't need heidbangers on this site. Please don't return

      Delete
    2. So, you're happy to publish YOUR opinions on a public forum, but should ANYONE dare call you out, comment deleted.
      And as for 'heidbangers', oh the irony...

      Delete
    3. So, you're happy to publish YOUR opinions on a public forum, but should ANYONE dare call you out, comment deleted.
      And as for 'heidbangers', oh the irony...

      Delete
    4. Its not a public forum DunderHeid.

      Delete
    5. Dear Mike
      Do enlighten us as to why *you* consider that this is not a public forum, I'd be interested in your definition...

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. It's my website heidbanger. I own it. I can choose who appears on the comment section. Now I ask once more politely. Go away.

      Delete
  10. Thanks for all the comments folks. Any one with any opinion is most welcome so long as you're polite. I hope you'll understand that I can't answer everyone's point. If I did I'd be writing two blogs instead of one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Indeed vote Conservative on principle of them being the true UK party but what you also get is Ruth Davidson who is smart, honest and capable along with policy's that are costed and deliverable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The same Davidson who has never won a constituency election ? In fact she was 4th in Kelvinside election ?

      Delete
  12. If only you employed logic and/or fact based evidence in your musings then they might, just maybe, have an ounce of credence. Alas not,. After Tories get a kicking in 2016 will it be "everyone except UKIP out"?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Recently had an argument with you about nationalism and how you object to the term BritNat. I told you then, I would accept your reasoning on the understanding you accept that many YES supporters (including me) are not nationalists either.

    You provided three definitions for independence. Two which do not apply and a third which applies to both of us but is trivial. 'A nationalist supports independence for their country.'

    Fair enough, I was happy to leave it there until...

    How on earth does that align with this,

    "So long as each party supported the UK wholeheartedly, I could support them"

    I voted YES and SNP but I even I am not THAT obsessed with nation. If the SNP started to act completly incompotent or introduced too many policies I do not like, I would be give up the Independence dream for a while and vote for someone else.

    So I suggest another definition for nationalist. 'A nationalist is somebody who puts nation before people'. They prioritise country before society. And that definition fits you to a tee. So, back to the drawing board Effie. Am I wrong? Explain to me why you are not a British Nationalist in denial?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How far do they have to go? Limiting the size of your garden, controlling your child? both are on there way.

      Delete
  14. Feel free to vote Tory, its a wasted vote in Scotland and only helps the SNP.

    ReplyDelete
  15. As a no voter who has been feeling a bit politically homeless lately this blog has been invaluable.

    The Scottish Conservatives have the look of a party in ascendency and there's a real chance of them becoming a relevant force in Scottish politics if they can position themselves as the credible unionist vote.

    So thanks for sharing this blog post Effie and reminding us all just how repellent all these age old Tory shibboleths actually are.

    ReplyDelete